Tag Archives: Feigenbaum test

Feigenbaum test and semantic disambiguation

Now it is patent that there cannot be successful  Feigenbaum test (i.e. not only occasional Feigenbaum hits, but regular and average performance) without an adequate treatment of semantic disambiguation. Arguably, it is one hard problem of machine translation. Here are some … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Feigenbaum test and semantic disambiguation

Translating French into the ‘sartinesu’ variant of Corsican language

Translating French into the ‘sartinesu’ variant of Corsican language: scoring 1 – (1/105) = 99.04%. Feigenbum hit? Yes: ‘médailleur’ is not common word.

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Double adjective accordance: scoring 98.43%

Now scoring 1 – 2/128 = 98.43%. There are only two related errors, of a special case of adjective accordance: ‘aux xxie et XXe siècles’  (in the 21st and 20th centuries) should translate into: à i XIXu è XXu seculi. … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Double adjective accordance: scoring 98.43%

The disambiguation of French ‘fils’ again: scoring 98.42%

Scoring 1 – 2/127 = 98.42%. Of interest: ‘de 839 à sa mort’ (from 839 to his death) should read: da u 839 à a so morte. French ‘de’ translates either into di or into da in Corsican language (to … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The disambiguation of French ‘fils’ again: scoring 98.42%