Author Archives: pilinu

False positives again

Now we face false positives again: French proper noun ‘Détroit’ is translated erroneously into Strittonu when it shouls have been left untradslated, being a proper noun.  The ambiguity of ‘Détroit’ lies in the fact that it can be translated either into: Détroit, … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Evaluation of machine translation: why not self-evaluation?

Evaluation of machine translation is usually done via external tools (to cite some instances: ARPA, BLEU, METEOR, LEPOR, …). But let us investigate the idea of self-evaluation. For it seems that the software itself is capable of having an accurate … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Semantic disambiguation of French ‘femme’: in the mud, gold is still shining

  In Corsican language, French word ‘femme’ can be translated, depending on the context either into donna (woman) or into moglia (wife) The above sample still contains a lot of vocabulary and grammatical disambiguation errors (easy/medium difficulty), but it handles … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Special Case of Anaphora Resolution

Anaphora resolution usually refers to pronouns. But we face here a special case of anaphora resolution that relates to an adjective. The following sentence: ‘un vase de Chine authentique’ (an authentic vase of China) is translated erroneously as un vasu … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Four consecutive ambiguous words

Translating the following sentence: ‘ce fait est unique’ is not as easy as it could seem at first glance. In effect, it is made up of four consecutive ambiguous words: ‘ce’: ‘ssu (demonstrative pronoun, this) or ciò (it, relative pronoun) … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment